I have not experienced reversing but have had some clear results using EVP. I was distraut to hear that going to the light is the wrong thing to do (Peggy’s post - hello Peggy). I feel very guilty as I recieved many messages of ‘help me’ (I assumed these paople were vibrating lowly-suicide cases for example). I advised these souls to go to the light!

I hope you can see my perdicament. What have I done? I haven’t done EVP for about 8 years or so and obviously im feeling guilty and Im trying to justify to myself that I thought I was doing the right thing at the time. Did I advise these people to go to a kind of hell? I also did table tilting, ouija and have sat in a sitting with a well known UK medium. Why was advise not given here to cease our advise to those lost souls? I have cried and have not cried for a long time, not only for these souls but for the ones described as being hunted in earlier posts. There is nothing that makes me hurt more inside than to think of children in distress.

Getting back to my original intention for accessing this site. It all seems very very complicated and entangled, and the whole issue around illuminati and 2012 seems paradoxical when you cant decide who is telling the truth. Is reversing the only tool that can be used in weeding out the distorters of truth?

David Wilcock has a good message, and instead of bagging the guy out, I suggest you leave him alone (since you are obviosly not resonant) and start work on a message of your own that might do some good rather than attempting to destroy or discredit the work of others.

I repeatedly questioned his methods on the forum and my constantly censored or removed. Project Camelot apparently receives some kind of funding/donations from David, so I can understand why my comments are removed. I think this si s areal shame as project Camelot have done some great interviews in the past, however I feel they are easily manipulated by people with their own agendas.

If we are all going to go into a new density - as he claims - why the constant marketing and sale of products? Why does he need money for is all this is going to end. I also dont like his constant criticism of any opinion counter to his own.

The likeness between him and Cayce - heck i can myself look like Cayce with Photoshop…

In my opinion this guy is a complete shame and a grave danger to people in general. If anything, he should be registered on the Cult Awareness group - http://www.rickross.com

Okay, it has now been 4 days since I sent the following critique to the Wilcock site, and if you scroll down to the comment section, you will see that it is NOT in there, and that the only comments accepted were the praiseworthy one. Do take a close look at that.

From this, we can conclude, that DW is NOT interested in a reasonable discussion of his ideas. I further conclude that now that this is clearly established, it will be a short amount of time that his believers start to see this other side.

Here is the page. As you scroll down, refer to the image of the ‘Infinity Crop Circle’.

http://divinecosmos.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=405&Itemid=70

David uses this image by telling others that it is a CC used to represent the moon’s movements in Aug 2008. This is part of a larger theory where he strings together ‘various’ CCs that all do the same. Yet no other CCs are provided. DW’s followers are just told to accept as fact his statement that there are other such circles.

So, let’s see what he comes up with with the one sample

I have lost the original critique I sent, but these comments adequately describe the overall assessment. Ask yourself if anybody who was truly interested in spirituality and The Truth would keep such criticisms off of his site…

A. If you look at the CC, you will see that there is nothing intuitively obvious about this even being a ‘lunar’ CC. We have the suggestion of some sort of celestial body, perhaps orbiting some central body, perhaps indicated the phases of some celestial body, but there is nothing definitive at all about the image this way.

B. DW puts it alongside a picture of the phases of the moon, but this is where things start to really break down. There are a total of 45 circles in the Infinity CC, or 44 surrounding a central hub circle.

Yet if this were intended to represent our moon, in any month, wouldn’t it be better to

1 - have 28 or so circles instead of 45, in order to make it much more intuitively obvious that the CC does in fact reference our moon? Alternatively, 56 circles might be LOT better than 45, as this would be about exactly double the actual number of days in an earthly lunar cycle.

2 - would it be better of the CCers, if they were to,rather than just make circles, actually have partial ones that went all the way down to crescent shapes, in order to mimic the actual phases of the moon as we see them?

There is no sense of ‘occulting’ in the Infinity CC at all, and therefore no obvious reason to suggest that this CC represents the moon as it begins to fade from view as it goes from full to crescent and back and forth.

C. If we dismiss all of the above, then it is just a small matter of making the center circle represent Aug 16. All DW does then is count back 15 circles in order to MAKE THE FIT. But in doing so he must ignore 7 of the other circles in both the top and bottom halves of the image. That is too arbitrary.

CONCLUSIONS

For David Wilcock to not only NOT mention this, but to make sure that it stays off of the cited page above, is tantamount do spiritual deceit.

From this I conclude that, reverse speech aside, DW is at best a somewhat polluted channel who, through acting in his own self interest, is willing to obfuscate The Truth from those who follow his ‘teachings’. All of this deception will be noted by those who are transmitting the information, and for this he will probably have to pay much more dearly than he thinks.

But as for those who would pay - for his cruise, for his speaking engagements, and all the rest, I say BUYER BEWARE, DAVID WILCOCK HAS SOME SERIOUS CHARACTER ISSUES.

And this is only just the beginning.

Okay, it has now been 4 days since I sent the following critique to the Wilcock site, and if you scroll down to the comment section, you will see that it is NOT in there, and that the only comments accepted were the praiseworthy one.

From this, we can conclude, that DW is NOT interested in a reasonable discussion of his ideas. I further conclude that now that this is clearly established, it will be a short amount of time that his believers start to see this other side.

Here is the page. As you scroll down, refer to the image of the ‘Infinity Crop Circle’.

http://divinecosmos.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=405&Itemid=70

David uses this image by telling others that it is a CC used to represent the moon’s movements in Aug 2008. This is part of a larger theory where he strings together ‘various’ CCs that all do the same. Yet no other CCs are provided. DW’s followers are just told to accept as fact his statement that there are other such circles.

So, let’s see what he comes up with with the one sample

I have lost the original critique I sent, but these comments adequately describe the overall assessment. Ask yourself if anybody who was truly interested in spirituality and The Truth would keep such criticisms off of his site…

A. If you look at the CC, you will see that there is nothing intuitively obvious about this even being a ‘lunar’ CC. We have the suggestion of some sort of celestial body, perhaps orbiting some central body, perhaps indicated the phases of some celestial body, but there is nothing definitive at all about the image this way.

B. DW puts it alongside a picture of the phases of the moon, but this is where things start to really break down. There are a total of 45 circles in the Infinity CC, or 44 surrounding a central hub circle.

Yet if this were intended to represent our moon, in any month, wouldn’t it be better to

1 - have 28 or so circles instead of 45, in order to make it much more intuitively obvious that the CC does in fact reference our moon? Alternatively, 56 circles might be LOT better than 45, as this would be about exactly double the actual number of days in an earthly lunar cycle.

2 - would it be better of the CCers, if they were to,rather than just make circles, actually have partial ones that went all the way down to crescent shapes, in order to mimic the actual phases of the moon as we see them?

There is no sense of ‘occulting’ in the Infinity CC at all, and therefore no obvious reason to suggest that this CC represents the moon as it begins to fade from view as it goes from full to crescent and back and forth.

C. If we dismiss all of the above, then it is just a small matter of making the center circle represent Aug 16. All DW does then is count back 15 circles in order to MAKE THE FIT. But in doing so he must ignore 7 of the other circles in both the top and bottom halves of the image. That is too arbitrary.

CONCLUSIONS

For David Wilcock to not only NOT mention this, but to make sure that it stays off of the cited page above, is tantamount do spiritual deceit.

From this I conclude that DW is at best a somewhat polluted channel who, through acting in his own self interest, is willing to obfuscate The Truth from those who follow his ‘teachings’. All of this deception will be noted by those who are transmitting the information, and for this he will probably have to pay much more dearly than he thinks.

But as for those who would pay - for his cruise, for his speaking engagements, and all the rest, I say BUYER BEWARE, DAVID WILCOCK HAS SOME SERIOUS CHARACTER ISSUES.

And this is only just the beginning.