Problem with Larry Sinclair Polygraph Test, Deception.
I just received an email about the man, Larry Sinclair, who accused Barack Obama of drug use and gay sex in a video that has gone out all over the Internet. As most of you here know, I disagreed with David Oates RS finding that Sinclair was congruent.
I just got this information so I’m letting everyone know what seems to be happening.
Even though David and I have had our disagreements with the meanings of the metaphors and some of our RS results, I still respect David, as a person and for his great contributions. Hey I still get hammered about “May.” So I can relate (even though I was only half wrong lol.)
Topic: Reverse Speech stands by its sinclair results (Read 35 times) Redwolfe Administrator member is offline Joined: Feb 2008 Gender: Male Posts: 79 Location: Adelaide, South Australia Karma: 4 Reverse Speech stands by its sinclair results « Thread Started on Today at 12:42pm » -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Reverse Speech Stands by Its Sinclair Results Whitehouse.com has announced a very limited and somewhat cryptic statement about the first portion of the polygraph examination test results for Larry Sinclair, the man who claimed he shared drugs and had gay sex with Barack Obama. Their official statement says "deception indicated." This rather nebulous remark throws no light on the actual 'deception' they are referring to during the four hour session. One wonders why WhiteHouse.com appears to be stringing this process out? Reverse Speech.com, however, stands firmly by its reversal analysis of Larry Sinclair which indicate he is telling a true story. Reverse Speech found no 'deception' of any kind in Mr. Sinclair's accounting. Furthermore, Reverse Speech did find clearly conflcted and incongruent reversals in its evaluation of a number of campaign statements by Mr. Obama. Both Sinclair and Obama reversals can be heard here: http://reversespeech.com/obamadrugs.htm and http://www.reversespeech.com/obama.htm It is extremely important to note that in its 24 year history, Reverse Speech has never once been proven to have been wrong or to have erred in determining a person's genuine truth spoken by that person's subconscious mind. Some of its successes can be seen here - http://www.reversespeech.com/trackrec.htm The polygraph, on the other hand, has a vast history of documented failures of false positive and false negative results. In fact, Wikipedia states "A 1997 survey of 421 psychologists estimated the test's average accuracy at about 61%, a little better than chance." See more here - http://rense.com/general80/poly.htm ReverseSpeech.com also wonders why Barack Obama has not come forward to refute Sinclair's claims, and is now calling on him to do so. Reverse Speech would welcome the opportunity to analyze Mr. Obama speaking directly about the Sinclair allegations. http://www.reversespeech.com/sinclairpoly.htm
I got a reversal a couple of months ago about may when I asked if anybody in my neighbourhood had been implanted. I got “snail, MAY, they got it now” (very clear) I also got “men are ours” …what are those wierdos up to?
tom i have no idea.
Tom, snail, and snailies comes up a lot in reverse. I have found that if I snip away at this word a bit, like take off the sn and then nip away at the back of the word, I can often pull out alien. Alien is the generic term for reptilians. Everyone on the other side including themselves refers to them as aliens, not reptilians although I have heard reptilians and reptoids a few times.
.
I’ve also heard that they are planning their big exodus in May. Men are ours would refer to the fact that they have owned earth for a very long time and are going to be in the last stages of meat collection.
.
Use a lot of shielding around yourself. No matter what happens, the end is going to be fantastic. They are going to hell and we are going to be set free, healed and the Earth beyond incredible.
.
I just posted that it seems I am going to have to restructure this site. I don’t know how to even begin this, but domains has become too much of a troll, he’s turned into a menace. So I’m asking everyone for patience while this is happening.
Hi Peggy. Saw a fe comments about sharing email addresses. Don’t want to be in the dark in case anything happens, where would I do this??? The information shared by these great warriors on this site keeps me going daily. LLB and hugs to all…..
About this topic~ Figures.
Jacqueline,
Peggy is busy at the moment with blog work, so I’ll answer your question,if you have no objections. Some of us worry when we don’t hear from family members. So, we have asked Peggy to forward our email address to a few family members of our choice. Just select a couple of sisters or brothers that you want to have email contact with . DO NOT POST YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS ON THE BLOG. Email it to Peggy and her ask her to forward it to people THAT YOU WANT TO HAVE IT. This way when we don’t hear from you, we can ask other family members have they been in contact with you. We will not share you email with anyone else. Only Peggy has our email adddresses. This is what we were talking about. Under no circumstances should you let domains or clone have your email . That said, just email Peggy and give a list of the people you want her to foward your email to.
F.F.
I am not a blogger, this site is new to me in the past week or so, I do not want to lose you people, as i have had so many questions about what is really going on in this world. You seem to be on the track of something real. Also, I am very non-tech minded, the reversing thing is not coming together for me, bottom line, iwant to be able to hook up w/ you wherever you land w/ the whole domains thing. mm2
mm2~ we are trying desperately to work this out…please stay and ask your questions.
We will work around this problem.